Showing posts with label nail art cross. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nail art cross. Show all posts

Monday, June 2, 2014

Did Jesus Really Die on a Cross?




Sbaptiste


âTHE cross,â says one encyclopedia, âis the most familiar symbol of Christianity.â Many religious paintings and works of art depict Jesus nailed to a cross. Why is this symbol so widespread in Christendom? Did Jesus really die on a cross?
Many would point to the Bible for the answer. For example, according to the King James Version, at the time of Jesusâ execution, onlookers made fun of Jesus and challenged him to âcome down from the cross.â (Matthew 27:40, 42) Many other Bible translations read similarly. Todayâs English Version says of Simon from Cyrene: âThe soldiers forced him to carry Jesusâ cross.â (Mark 15:21) In these verses, the word âcrossâ is translated from the Greek word staurosâ². Is there a solid basis for such a translation? What is the meaning of that original word?
Was It a Cross?
According to Greek scholar W. E. Vine, staurosâ² âdenotes, primarily, an upright pale or stake. On such malefactors were nailed for execution. Both the noun and the verb stauroÅ, to fasten to a stake or pale, are originally to be distinguished from the ecclesiastical form of a two beamed cross.â
The Imperial Bible-Dictionary says that the word staurosâ² âproperly signified a stake, an upright pole, or piece of paling, on which anything might be hung, or which might be used in impaling a piece of ground.â The dictionary continues: âEven amongst the Romans the crux (Latin, from which our cross is derived) appears to have been originally an upright pole.â Thus, it is not surprising that The Catholic Encyclopedia states: âCertain it is, at any rate, that the cross originally consisted of a simple vertical pole, sharpened at its upper end.â
There is another Greek word, xyâ²lon, that Bible writers used to describe the instrument of Jesusâ execution. A Critical Lexicon and Concordance to the English and Greek New Testament defines xyâ²lon as âa piece of timber, a wooden stake.â It goes on to say that like staurosâ², xyâ²lon âwas simply an upright pale or stake to which the Romans nailed those who were thus said to be crucified.â
In line with this, we note that the King James Version reads at Acts 5:30: âThe God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree [xyâ²lon].â Other versions, though rendering staurosâ² as âcross,â also translate xyâ²lon as âtree.â At Acts 13:29, The Jerusalem Bible says of Jesus: âWhen they had carried out everything that scripture foretells about him they took him down from the tree [xyâ²lon] and buried him.â
In view of the basic meaning of the Greek words staurosâ² and xyâ²lon, the Critical Lexicon and Concordance, quoted above, observes: âBoth words disagree with the modern idea of a cross, with which we have become familiarised by pictures.â In other words, what the Gospel writers described using the word staurosâ² was nothing like what people today call a cross. Appropriately, therefore, the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures uses the expression âtorture stakeâ at Matthew 27:40-42 and in other places where the word staurosâ² appears. Similarly, the Complete Jewish Bible uses the expression âexecution stake



Answer
This is the full quote from the Imperial Bible-Dictionary:

"The Greek word for cross, [stauros], properly signified a stake, an upright pole, or piece of paling, on which anything might be hung, or which might be used in impaling [fencing in] a piece of ground. But a modification was introduced as the dominion and usages of Rome extended themselves through Greek-speaking countries. Even amongst the Romans the crux (from which our cross is derived) appears to have been originally an upright pole, and this always remained the more prominent part. But from the time that it began to be recognized as an instrument of punishment, a transverse piece of wood was commonly added; not, however, always even then. For it would seem that there were more kinds of death than one by the cross: this being sometimes accomplished by transfixing the criminal with a pole, which was run through his back and spine, and came out at his mouth...In another place (Consol ad Marciam, xx.), Seneca mentions three different forms: 'I see,' says he, 'three crosses, not indeed of one sort, but fashioned in different ways: one sort suspending by the head persons bent toward the earth, others transfixing them through their secret parts, others extending their arms on a patibulum.' There can be no doubt, however, that the latter sort was the more common, and that about the period of the gospel age crucifixion was usually accomplished by suspending the criminal on a cross piece of wood."

The dictionary goes on to describe three different cross shapes (including "T" and "X"), and then the entry continues, "But the commonest form, it is understood, was that in which the upright piece of wood was crossed by another near the top, but not precisely at it...It was on a cross of this form, according to the general voice of tradition, that our Lord suffered; but there is nothing in the narratives of the evangelists which determines this to have been the form employed, rather than either of the other two. It is, however, the one most commonly met with in the paintings and sculptures that have survived from the earlier ages." (p377)

While it is clear that the Greek word stauros originally meant âstake,â a word means more than its simple etymology, as the English word "nice" demonstrates, which originally meant âignorantâ or âfoolish.â So to understand the biblical stauros, we must look at the historical as well as the linguistic context. Under whose judicial system, using whose methods of execution, did Jesus die? The Romans, of course. So Greek methods of execution are irrelevant â the issue is how Romans did it.

It is very likely that Greeks never used a cross-bar, but impaled people on a sharpened stake as the Phonecians did. Eventually, the Greeks at Carthage began to also hang people on an upright stake. The victims would suffocate very quickly. In fact, it was conclusively proven by medical researchers Frederick T. Zugibe and Hermann Moedder that a person hung by his arms overhead would suffocate in a manner of about 6 minutes, due to the inability of the lungs to expand and contract in such a position. Since Luke 23:44 and Matthew 27:45-46 show that Christ was on the cross for about three hours, the evidence points to His death on a traditional cross.

Some Nail Art Designs?




Sophia


I want to do nail art on my nails because I'm bored. So give me some ideas?


Answer
You could put black and then use another color and draw a curvy line. Or a just a cross on your nails.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, March 10, 2014

I read that the cross in the bible that Christ died on in hebrew is actually defined as a stake?




2fatrightn


So the cross that everyone symbolizes with Jesus wouldn't be accurate? If so, why do all the churches use the cross on everything?


Answer
The King James Bible says Jesus was put to death on a tree.

Acts 5:30 The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.
Acts 10:39 And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree:
Acts 13:29 And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they took him down from the tree, and laid him in a sepulchre.
Galatians 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

Michelangelo and the Cross

Italian government art experts are said to be â90 percent sureâ that a sculpture recently found in a monastery in Lebanon is the work of the famous Italian artist Michelangelo. The small wooden carving is said to be worth $2.5 million (U.S.) if it actually is Michelangeloâs work. According to an Associated Press report, âthe figure is unusual because it represents Christ with his hands stretched out above his head instead of to the side, as he usually is depicted on the cross.â

Whether the wooden sculpture is the work of the 16th-century artist Michelangelo or not, it illustrates that the impalement of Christ on a cross frame has not always been so certain as Christendomâs leaders today would have people believe. For example, the 16th-century Roman Catholic scholar Justus Lipsius illustrated impalement on an upright stake in his book âDe Cruce Liber Primus.â This fits the meaning of the Greek word used in the Bible to describe the impalement of Christ âstaurosâ which âdenotes, primarily, an upright pale or stake.â âAn Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words.

Jesus Christ did not die on a cross. The Greek word generally translated âcrossâ is stau·ros'. It basically means âan upright pale or stake.â The Companion Bible points out: âStau·ros' never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle . . . There is nothing in the Greek of the "New Testament" even to imply two pieces of timber.â

In several texts, Bible writers use another word for the instrument of Jesusâ death. It is the Greek word xy'lon. (Acts 5:30; 10:39; 13:29; Galatians 3:13; 1 Peter 2:24) This word simply means âtimberâ or âa stick, club, or tree.â

Explaining why a simple stake was often used for executions, the book Das Kreuz und die Kreuzigung (The Cross and the Crucifixion), by Hermann Fulda, states: âTrees were not everywhere available at the places chosen for public execution. So a simple beam was sunk into the ground. On this the outlaws, with hands raised upward and often also with their feet, were bound or nailed.â

The most convincing proof of all, however, comes from Godâs Word. The apostle Paul says: âChrist by purchase released us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse instead of us, because it is written: âAccursed is every man hanged upon a stake âa tree,â King James Version.ââ (Galatians 3:13) Here Paul quotes Deuteronomy 21:22, 23, which clearly refers to a stake, not a cross. Since such a means of execution made the person âa curse,â it would not be proper for Christians to decorate their homes with images of Christ impaled.

There is no evidence that for the first 300 years after Christâs death, those claiming to be Christians used the cross in worship. In the fourth century, however, pagan Emperor Constantine became a convert to apostate Christianity and promoted the cross as its symbol. Whatever Constantineâs motives, the cross had nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The cross is, in fact, pagan in origin. The New Catholic Encyclopedia admits: âThe cross is found in both pre-Christian and non-Christian cultures.â Various other authorities have linked the cross with nature worship and pagan sex rites.

Why christians believe that the cross can help them and the Christ did not use it?




ABC


Im muslim and want to know why the cross is very important to christians
and you all know that the Christ himself did not use it
so from where did the cross come



Answer
As Christian I personally don't believe in a cross, I would like to tell you why I, and so many of my friends are different.
The Greek word rendered âcrossâ in many modern Bible versions (âtorture stakeâ in NW) is stauâ§rosâ². In classical Greek, this word meant merely an upright stake, or pale. Later it also came to be used for an execution stake having a crosspiece. The Imperial Bible-Dictionary acknowledges this, saying: âThe Greek word for cross, [stauâ§rosâ²], properly signified a stake, an upright pole, or piece of paling, on which anything might be hung, or which might be used in impaling [fencing in] a piece of ground. . . . Even amongst the Romans the crux (from which our cross is derived) appears to have been originally an upright pole.ââEdited by P. Fairbairn (London, 1874), Vol. I, p. 376.
Was that the case in connection with the execution of Godâs Son? It is noteworthy that the Bible also uses the word xyâ²lon to identify the device used. A Greek-English Lexicon, by Liddell and Scott, defines this as meaning: âWood cut and ready for use, firewood, timber, etc. . . . piece of wood, log, beam, post . . . cudgel, club . . . stake on which criminals were impaled . . . of live wood, tree.â It also says âin NT, of the cross,â and cites Acts 5:30 and 10:39 as examples. (Oxford, 1968, pp. 1191, 1192) However, in those verses KJ, RS, JB, and Dy translate xyâ²lon as âtree.â (Compare this rendering with Galatians 3:13; Deuteronomy 21:22, 23.)
The book The Non-Christian Cross, by J. D. Parsons (London, 1896), says: âThere is not a single sentence in any of the numerous writings forming the New Testament, which, in the original Greek, bears even indirect evidence to the effect that the stauros used in the case of Jesus was other than an ordinary stauros; much less to the effect that it consisted, not of one piece of timber, but of two pieces nailed together in the form of a cross. . . . It is not a little misleading upon the part of our teachers to translate the word stauros as âcrossâ when rendering the Greek documents of the Church into our native tongue, and to support that action by putting âcrossâ in our lexicons as the meaning of stauros without carefully explaining that that was at any rate not the primary meaning of the word in the days of the Apostles, did not become its primary signification till long afterwards, and became so then, if at all, only because, despite the absence of corroborative evidence, it was for some reason or other assumed that the particular stauros upon which Jesus was executed had that particular shape.ââPp. 23, 24; see also The Companion Bible (London, 1885), Appendix No. 162.

The teaching of the cross was brought about the men the scriptures talked about would infiltrate the Christian congregation and corrupt it. This happened some time soon after 98CE. These are the same men who also brought in pagan teachings such as the trinity which corrupted the scriptural teaching that God is one. In Fact the bible teaches that Christians should not use any object as a form of devotion. This is what the bible teaches but many today have been blinded by what their religion teaches them and don't research the information for themselves to find out the truth.
Here is the scriptural references to prove this:
1 Cor. 10:14: âMy beloved ones, flee from idolatry.â (An idol is an image or symbol that is an object of intense devotion, veneration, or worship.)
Ex. 20:4, 5, JB: âYou shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven or on earth beneath or in the waters under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.â (Notice that God commanded that his people not even make an image before which people would bow down.)
Of interest is this comment in the New Catholic Encyclopedia: âThe representation of Christâs redemptive death on Golgotha does not occur in the symbolic art of the first Christian centuries. The early Christians, influenced by the Old Testament prohibition of graven images, were reluctant to depict even the instrument of the Lordâs Passion.ââ(1967), Vol. IV, p. 486.
Concerning first-century Christians, History of the Christian Church says: âThere was no use of the crucifix and no material representation of the cross.ââ(New York, 1897), J. F. Hurst, Vol. I, p. 366.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers